Engaged Listenership and Modality in English M.A. Theses Defenses in Al-Qadisiyah University

Authors

  • الباحثة: هند قاسم كامل البديري Al-Qadisiyah University
  • Mohammed Nasser Abdulsada Wasit University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol47.Iss1.2867

Keywords:

Spoken academic discourse, Conversational strategies, Thesis defense, Oral examination.

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines how engaged listenership and modality are conveyed in thesis examinations based on two M.A. theses defenses examined in Al-Qadisiyah University. This study followed a three-model analysis, that is Burton's (1980), Schegloff and Jefferson's (1974), and Sacks et al’s (1974). The study finds that there are several linguistic devices used in thesis defenses, including minimal and non-minimal response tokens, overlaps, interruption, auxiliary modal verbs, gestures, and turn-takings. Additionally, the examiners and candidates used minimal response items, e.g. hm, mm, ok, yeah, yes, non-minimal response items, e.g. all right, good, right, overlap, and interruptions, and modality e.g. must, should, will, would, can and could also are most common in spoken academic registers. In addition, the participants employed various conversational strategies during their turns at talk-in interactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, A.M. (2016). A pragmatic analysis of overlap in some selected conversations of Titanic & The King of Summer Movies. Tikrit University Journal of Humanities, 2(23), 397-424.

Basturkmen, H.L. (1995). The discourse of academic seminars: Structures & strategies of interaction. PhD Dissertation, University of Aston, UK.

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins.

Duff, P.A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.

Farr, F. (2003). Engaged listenership in spoken academic discourse: The case of student-tutor meetings. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 67-85.

Guthrie, A.M. (1997). On the systematic deployment of Okay & Mmhmm in academic advising sessions. Pragmatics, 7:3, 397-415.

Lee, D. (2006). Humor in spoken academic discourse. NUCB Journal of Language, Culture & Communication, 8:3(49-68).

McCarthy, M. (2003). Talking back: "Small" interactional response tokens in Everyday conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36(1), 33-63.

Nguyet, Thi Minh, N. & Mai, Thi Tuyet, L. (2018). Teaching Conversational Strategies Through Video Clips. Language Education in Asia, 2012, 3(1), 32-49.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50:4(696-735).

Suomela-Salmi, E. & Dervin, F. (eds.). (2009). Cross-linguistic & cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-01

Issue

Section

English

How to Cite

Qasim Kamil, H. ., & Nasser Abdulsada, M. . (2022). Engaged Listenership and Modality in English M.A. Theses Defenses in Al-Qadisiyah University. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(47), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol47.Iss1.2867