A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of the Iranian Protests in Selected Newspapers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol56.Iss2.3523Keywords:
Iranian Protests, CDA, Ideologies, Strategies, Newspapers.Abstract
The present study is devoted to the analysis of the representation of the Iranian protest in selected newspapers. The protests in Iran are regarded a turning point in the history of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The protests are of interest to many national and international newspapers who took the events into serious consideration. The study aims at investigating these events from the CDA point of view. It, however intends to uncover the linguistic components, the ideologies and the power relations that are employed in the selected reports. The study is qualitative in nature and is based on Fairclough’s (2001) three-dimensional approach. Two reports from two newspapers; the Washington Post and the Tehran Times, are selected as samples of the current study. After analysing the selected data, it has been found that the two newspapers contain different linguistic features such as overwording, lexical relations, besides that they encompass several ideologies and the representation of various power relations. These linguistic and non-linguistic strategies are utilised by the editors when addressing the Iranian protests. The American newspaper is assured to positively represent the protest and support them, while the Iranian newspaper is proved to negatively describe the protests and deny the protestors’ rights in expressing their opinions and demands.
Downloads
References
Alhusseini, H. A. M. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of ideological terror attacks in
selected media reports. Journal of Education College2020, Volume 3, Issue 41, Pages 497-518. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/191393
Al-Mjdawi, A. M. and Jabi, S. I. (2020). A Pragma-semiotic analysis of emoticons in social
media. Education & Linguistics Research ISSN 2377-1356 2020, Vol. 6, No. 2
URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v6i2.17887
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, K.C. (2010). Introduction to
research in education. Wadsworth Cengage learning.
Bhatia, V. (2008). Legal discourse across cultures & systems. Hong Kong University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixedmethod approaches. Sage Publication.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public discourse:
The Universities. Journal of Discourse and Society. 4.2: 168. Web. 13 Nov. 2014.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical discourse Analysis: A multidisciplinary introduction. Sage
publications.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research.
Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage publications.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Tony Blair and the Longman of Politics. Longman.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news. Routledge.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language
of William Golding's 'the inheritors'. In Chatman, S (Ed.), Literary style:
[Symposium]. Oxford University Press.
Kohli, A. (2022). Here's what has happened in Iran since the death of Mahsa Amini.
https://time.com/6220853/iran-protests-mahsa-amini-what-to-know
Machin, D., and Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodal
introduction. Sage Publications.
Martin, J.R. & Wodak, R. (2003). Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives
on time and value. John Benjamins.
Nakhilawi, H. A. M. (2016). Ethnosemantic, pragmatic, and textual analysis of kinship terms
in Arabic and English discourse. Doctorate Thesis. University of Sains Malaysia.
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: an introduction. Bloomsbury
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: an approach from critical discourse
analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Slembrouck, S. (2010). Discourse analysis. Routledge
Tehran Times (2023). https://www.tehrantimes.com/
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In Wodak, R and Meyer,
M (eds). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications. (pp.: 95-120).
Van Dijk, T.A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In R. Wodak (ed). Elsevier
encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Volume on Politics and Language.
Washington Post (2023). https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In J. Verschueren.
Handbook of pragmatic. Benjamins.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and
Methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer, Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd
ed., pp. 1-34). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 اثير داخل شاتي, أ.م.د. إيناس ناجي كاظم
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.