The stylistic diversity of Eloquence and its relationship to the stylistic analysis levels

Abstract

        Eloquence and stylsticism are two concepts that intersect in several common points and sometimes differ. Both of them is complementary to the other and the share common points and also have discrepancies however, their relationship is very tight. Sometimes, the discrepency is due to the variance in the point of view and in other times in other points. The advocate of any doctrine aims at manifesting more characteristics, which make the eloquence art or the stylesticism appear as the best and the dominant. Nevertheless, several constants remain beyond disbute for the two parties and most important of which is that stylesticism is an extension of eloquence and complementary to it. In addition to that eloquence aspects represent the roots of the various stylesticism methodologies grew depending on them. It is true that it is different from eloquence in most of its methodologies, yet it is connected to it in terms of the basic implications and essential issues including the linguistic analysis and in spite if this its vitality is different in the literary analysis.