A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Visually Shaping Abstract Words

Authors

  • Zahraa Jabbar Qasim College of Education for Women-University of Baghdad1
  • dr. Rana H. Al-Bahrani College of Education for Women-University of Baghdad1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol57.Iss2.4137

Keywords:

cognitive linguistics, concept, blackmailing, abstract nouns, frame semantics, visualization, visual thought

Abstract

The current study qualitatively addresses concept as the main theoretical problem in cognitive linguistics on the one hand, and the abstract nature of things on the other. In this regard, scholars maintained that the issue with concept is still controversial and to deal with abstract nouns is also difficult, let alone when dealing with the concept of abstract noun. Of course the problem will be doubled as the nature of both concepts and abstract nouns is invisible, perspectivised, and changeable. Accordingly, the objective of the present work is to examine  the semantic range of the abstract word BLACKMAILING from the perspectives of a number of talented participants in drawing. That is, the researchers are to address the following research question: What is the semantic range of the selected abstract word (blackmailing) from the participants’ perspectives who are talented in drawing? The researchers adopted Fillmore's (1976/77) theory of Frame Semantics. As for the data, one abstract word (blackmailing) has been selected based on the juror’s opinion to be applied on a number of six college students, who are talented in drawing. The study has concluded that: there is no fixed referential connection between an abstract word and its concept; the participants anchored their understanding of abstract nouns in pictures that represent minimized scenes or events of reality using concrete referents and associations. Finally, one might encounter a similarity in terms of using some the frame elements; however, their employment is different. Finally, the semantic range of BLACKMAILING is between four to 10 elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd, H. M. (2022). Jurisprudence Rules Related to the Crime of Electronic Extortion. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 61(4), 330-346. Retrieved from https://alustath.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/UJIRCO/article/view/1890/1453

Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2018). A cognitive linguistic study of silence/pause-based incongruities in selected instances from mind your language's sitcom series. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(30),795-829. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol1.Iss30.334

Al-Bahrani, R. H., & Al-Rubaye, M. R. (2017). A cognitive semantic analysis of the preposition at. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 2(25), 1581-1606. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss25.2753

Al-Bahrani, R. H., Al-Saadi, Sh. K., and Yousif, T. (2016). A Detextulaized Social Caricature as a Source of Plural Denotations. International Journal of English and Education, 5(1), 76-92. Retrieved from https://ijee.org/assets/docs/7_rana.0233519.pdf

Al-Bahrani, R.H. & Al-Azzawi, Sh. M.A. (2017). Visual Language as a Source of Creative Cognition. AIJLLS, 1(3), 484-495. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=utdhkyQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=utdhkyQAAAAJ:Tyk-4Ss8FVUC

Al-Fatlawi, Z.A., & Al-Bahrani, R.H. (2019). Impact of Number and Type of Figures’ Identification on Accessing Caricatures’ Meaning. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 421-436. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v9n1p421

Ali, F. H. (2016). Color and its Semiotic reflections in Iraqi press. ALBAHITH ALALAMI, 8(33-34), 205-220. Retrieved from https://iasj.net/iasj/download/38466c0ad5edae90

Ali, S. K., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2021). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of the Persuasive /Attention Strategies Used in Selected American English E-Advertisements. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL (7), 279-298. Retrieved from DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.20

Ali, S. K., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2021). A comparative cognitive linguistic study of persuasive/attention strategies in Iraqi and American Facebook advertisements. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(9), 2993-3010. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=utdhkyQAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=utdhkyQAAAAJ:MXK_kJrjxJIC

Al-Jubori, L. O. H., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2022). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Battered Woman in Selected Iraqi Caricatures. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 33(3), 20-35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.36231/coedw.v33i3.1617

AlleyDog.com. (2024). Visual Thinking. Psychology students’ best friend. Retrieved from https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Visual+Thinking

Al-Zubaidi, N. A. G. & Abdullah, M.F. (2018). Semiotics across cultures: An analysis of shop signs in American and Iraqi contexts. Al-Adab Journal, 1(124), 31-48. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i124.112

Azeez, F. A. S., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2019). A cognitive linguistic study of the satirical language in Al-Hajjar's caricatures. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 30(1), 203-217.Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/bfbb6ba04dc4e889

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1319

Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W.K. Barbey, A.K., & Wilson, Ch. D. (2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Journal of Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84-91). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3

Bled, C., Guillon, Q., Soulières, I., & Bouvet, L. (2021). Thinking in pictures in everyday life situations among autistic adults. Plos one, 16(7), 1-14. e0255039.‏ Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297849/pdf/pone.0255039.pdf

Bogdashina, O. (December 19, 2016). Visual thinking. The Voice. Retrieved from https://www.integratedtreatmentservices.co.uk/blog/11996/

Borghi, A. M. and Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York: Springer. Retrieved in https://www.google.iq/books/edition/Words_as_Social_Tools_An_Embodied_View_o/BTq3BAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=difficulties+of+abstract+words&printsec=frontcover

Connel, L. & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125(3), 452-465. Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/connelll/papers/Connell-Lynott-2012-CogSci1.pdf

Crutch, S.J. & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational framework. Brain, 128, 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh349

Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2001). The importance of visualisation in concept design. Design Studies, 22(1), 5-26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00028-9

Dickson, H., Thompson, C. D., & O'Toole, P. (2016). A picture is worth a thousand words: Investigating first year chemistry students’ ability to visually express their understanding of chemistry concepts. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(1), 12-23. Retrieved from https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/9043/10279

Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. K. (2007). Visual representations as ‘artefacts of knowing’. Building Research & Information, 35(1), 81-89.‏ Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239392134_Visual_representations_as_'artefacts_of_knowing'

Fillmore, C. J. (1976, October). Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the origin and development of language and speech (Vol. 280, No. 1, pp. 20-32). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x

Fillmore, Ch. J. (1977). "The Case for Case Responded". In: Peter Cole and Jerrold M. Sadock. Syntax and semantics 8. Grammatical relations, (pp. 59-81). New York: Academic Press.

Fillmore, Ch. J., & Atkins, S. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Lehrer, Adrienne, and Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. (pp.75–102). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Gavilan, D., & Avello, M. (2021). Can a word paint a thousand pictures? Brand-evoked mental imagery in advertising. Cuadernos. info, (49), 125-145. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/cinfo/n49/0719-367X-cinfo-49-125.pdf

Haiman, John (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Stanford: John Benjamins.

Hussien, L. O., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2023). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Visual Language as a Reflection of Culture: Violence Against Women in Iraq. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 34(1), 10-32. Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/4e901ae14f1d9b87

Izatullaevna, I. I. (2022). Concept as the basic term of the cognitive linguistics. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 2(9), 533-538.‏ Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/concept-as-the-basic-term-of-the-cognitive-linguistics

Jaber, H. F. & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2021). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Construal Operations in Selected Strange Trend Silent Animated Films. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(09), 3011- 3029. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=utdhkyQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=utdhkyQAAAAJ:8k81kl-MbHgC

Jabbar, K. W. & Fahid, A. M. (2018). A cognitive linguistic study of up and down in Iraqi Arabic. Journal of College of Languages, (37), 125-144. Retrieved from https://jcolang.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/JCL/article/view/37/26

Kreem, M. S. A., Ali, Z. A., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2022). Intonational patterns of persuasive strategies in Blair's speech: A socio-cognitive phonological analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 683-696. Retrieved from http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3624

Madan, Ch. R. Memories that matter: How we remember important things. (2023). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.google.iq/books/edition/Memories_That_Matter/7u34EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pictorial+representations+of+abstract+words&pg=PA2057&printsec=frontcover

MindManager. (December 7, 2023). What is visual thinking and why it is useful? Retrieved from https://blog.mindmanager.com/202010202008visual-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-its-useful/?alid=960323060.1719567962

Murphy, G. L. & Wisniewski, E. J. (1989). Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 572-586. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.4.572

Necaise, A., McConnell, D. S., & Amon, M. J. (2022). The relationship between individual differences in mental imagery vividness and emotional distress. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 44, ‏1940-1946. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/content/qt9ct087b4/qt9ct087b4_noSplash_03313d014052798abec4f74e406a5095.pdf?t=reclbx

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Paivio, A., & Simpson, H. M. (1966). The effect of word abstractness and pleasantness on pupil size during an imagery task. Psychonomic Science, 5(2), 55-56.‏ DOI: 10.3758/BF03328277

Phifer, E. (2008). Boosting the mind’s eye: Visualizing for social and emotional intelligence. Florida: Universal Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.google.iq/books/edition/Boosting_the_Mind_s_Eye/ehCT2akgjVoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pictorial+representations+of+abstract+words&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover

Qasim, Z. J. & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (in process). A cognitive linguistic study of framing the pictorial representations of apple. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies.

Sangoor, M. M. (2023). Using cognitive linguistics to teach synonyms for Iraqi college students. Al-Adab Journal, 1(147), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i147.4146

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/748013

Shodiya, O. (2023). The main concept of cognitive linguistics and linguoculturology. Zamonaviy dunyoda innovatsion tadqiqotlar: Nazariya va amaliyot nomli ilmiy, masofaviy, Onlayn Konferensiya, 2(2), 63–65. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdit/article/view/8520

Tariq, M. Z., & Al-Bahrani, R. H. (2019). The Applicability of Attardo's Set-up, Incongruity, Resolution Model on Unintentional Incongruities. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(34), 571-592. Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/0a3cf18e0b8d245d

Tohirovich, M. D. (2021). Basic concepts of cognitive linguistics. International Scientific Research Journal, 2(6), 2776-0979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/32BWZ

TOP HAT. (2024). Glossary. Retrieved from https://tophat.com/glossary/v/visual-thinking/

VanZandt, P. (2022). What is visual thinking: Definition, strategies, examples, and more.IDEASCALE. Retrieved from https://ideascale.com/blog/visual-thinking-definition/

Waad, M., & Al-Bahrani, H. R. (2020). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Non-Verbal Persuasive Strategies in Selected Iraqi and Malaysian Tourism Brochures. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 2(40), 657-676. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss40.1632

Ware, C. (2021). Visual thinking: The ability to understand and interpret information conveyed visually through graphs, charts, and other means. Science Direct. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/visual-thinking

Wiemer-Hastings, K. & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 719-727. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33

Yuille, J.C. (2014). Imagery, memory and cognition. London: Psychology Press. Retrieved from https://www.google.iq/books/edition/Imagery_Memory_and_Cognition_PLE_Memory/ll6LAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=pictorial+representations+of+abstract+words&pg=PT215&printsec=frontcover

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Zahraa Jabbar Qasim, & dr. Rana H. Al-Bahrani. (2024). A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Visually Shaping Abstract Words. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 57(2), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol57.Iss2.4137