A Multi-modal Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected English Political Cartoons

Authors

  • Assist. Lectu. Hanan Najim Abd Ali College of Languages / University of Baghdad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol60.Iss2.4518

Keywords:

political cartoons, multimodal discourse analysis, representational , interactive , compositional.

Abstract

This study analyses six political cartoons selected based on their relevance to current Iraqi political issues, specifically the period between 2005 and 2015, from American online newspapers (calgecartooms.com). The selection criteria included the cartoons' satirical elements, visual rhetoric, and their ability to engage with themes such as power dynamics, social issues, and public opinion. It sheds light on how these cartoons can function as mediators of meanings between the cartoonists and the readers. The data is examined using multimodal discourse analysis (MDA), which combines language study with the analysis of other visual elements, like colors, gestures, and images, to understand meaning (O’Halloran et al., 2011). The Visual Social Semiotics framework proposed by Kress and Van Leeuwen is applied for data analysis. According to Kress and Van Leeuwen (2006, p. 1), who built upon Halliday’s functional socio-semiotic theory of language (1975, 1978, 1994, 2004), visual texts serve as resources for encoding interpretations of experience and enacting forms of social interaction. They identify three functions of meaning that act as semiotic modes of communication: representational meaning, interactive meaning, and compositional meaning. Moreover, the study attempts to demonstrate how cartoons portray surrounding circumstances, particularly political events, and examines their role in reflecting the main issues present in our daily lives and their impact on readers' beliefs and attitudes. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

- Abdulrazzaq, A. H. (2022). Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Caricatures about Electricity Shortages in Iraqi Facebook Pages. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 9(3), 12-23.

- Achour, K., & Adel, L. (2021). A Semiotic and Multimodal Analysis of Covid19 Caricatures: the Liberté, The Guardian and The Seattle Times Newspapers (Doctoral dissertation, Université Mouloud Mammeri Tizi Ouzou).

- Ademilokun, M., & Olateju, M. (2016). A multimodal discourse analysis of some visual images in the political rally discourse of 2011 electioneering campaigns in southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v1i.101

- Aiello, G. (2020). Visual semiotics: Key concepts and new directions. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods, 367-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.n23

- Akinwole, A., & Scholar, F. (2015). Media Cartoon as Social Discourse: A Multimodal Analysis of Cartoons in Nigerian Tribune (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lagos).

- Al-Momani, K., Badarneh, M. A., & Migdadi, F. (2017). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons in Jordan in light of the Arab Spring. Humor 30(1), 63– 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0033

- Calder, A. J, Rowlanf, D , Young, A.W., Nimmo-Smith, I. Keane, J. Perrett, D. (2000). Caricaturiing Facial Expressions. Cognition, 76, 105-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00074-3

- De Sousa, M. A. , & Medhurst, M.J. (1981). Political Cartoons and American Culture: Significant Symbols of Campaign 980. Studies in Visual Communication, 8, 84-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2326-8492.1982.tb00061.x

- Dugalich, N. M. (2018). Political cartoon as a genre of political discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 9(1), 158- 172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-158-172

- El-Falaky, M. S. (2019). Caricaturing Two Revolutions: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Egyptian Political Cartoons. In International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities.

- Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 2056305120921575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575

- Gandhi, A., Adhvaryu, K., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2023). Multimodal sentiment analysis: A systematic review of history, datasets, multimodal fusion methods, applications, challenges and future directions. Information Fusion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.025

- Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1

- Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Hodder Education.

- Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.

- Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Language and the theory of codes. In A. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp. 124–142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

- Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). On grammar as the driving force from primary to higher-order consciousness. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (Eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals (pp. 15–44). London: Continuum. Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O'Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.

- Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996, 2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

- Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London, England: Arnold.

- Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Psychology. Press. Retrieved April, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234

- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.

- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images-the grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Kulikova, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

- Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. Bloomsbury: London

- Naghy, E. C. (2010). Directing ideologies through media cartoons. Retrieved from Semantics Scholar: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd =&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjkkPjJp_7wAhVIExoKHe73Ck4QFjAB egQIFRAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.semanticscholar.org%2Fpaper% 2FDirecting-Ideologies-through-Media-CartoonsNaghy%2F7c0a26cce4b57bc9cb99793.

- O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (Ed.) Companion to Discourse. London and New York: Continuum.

- Omosebi, T. (2021). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of the Implicature of some Political Cartoons Associated with the 2020 American Presidential Election. Exploring Discourse Practices in Romanian, 146.

- Panadero, E. & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416

- Rustamov, T., Jumanazarov, X. M., Almatova, U., Mamaziyayev, Z. X., & Alibekova, Z. A. (2022). Classification symbols of words. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 213-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2022.00097.1

- Shaikh, N. Z., Tariq, R., & Saqlain, N. U. S. (2019). Cartoon war. A political dilemma! A semiotic analysis of political cartoons. Journal of Media Studies, 31(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Assist. Lectu. Hanan Najim Abd Ali. (2025). A Multi-modal Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected English Political Cartoons. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 60(2), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol60.Iss2.4518