A Study of Manipulation in Some Selected Reports

Authors

  • Alia ' Jawad Almagsosi جامعة واسط/ كلية التربية
  • Khalida H. Alghezzy جامعة واسط/ كلية التربية

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss42.2101

Keywords:

Manipulation, direct and indirect manipulation, language, covert and negative intention.

Abstract

The current study is concerned with Manipulation as one of the important linguistic phenomena. Manipulation is a linguistic term with great creative potential that is first and foremost topical in the framework of the theory of linguistic manipulation. The widespread and blurry semantic filed of  ‘manipulation’ includes the key elements like the speaker’s negative and covert intention that is not evident for the listener.

     The study aims at showing the concept of manipulation, its types and the use of manipulation in two reports concerning Golan Heights presented by CNN and RT.

       The study adopts an eclectic model of analysis, Malyuga and et al, 2018, Issers, 2008 and Leontive, 1999 . The study concludes that manipulation is divided into five main types according to: the nature of subject-object interaction, awareness of verbal actions, the type of speech acts, nature of recipient’s response in addition to the objective focus of manipulative efforts. There is a great similarity in the use of manipulation and its types in both reports. The only difference between them is in terms of the ‘nature of subject-object interaction’ that CNN uses direct 100% while RT uses direct and indirect manipulation equally 50%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asya, R. (2017). Linguistic manipulation: definition and types.

University of Rostov.

Blass, R. (2002). Manipulation in the speeches and writings of hitler

and the NSDAP. Paper delivered at the International Conference

on Manipulation in the Totalitarian Regimes of the Century,

Ascona, Switzerland.

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London: Routledge.

Chilton, Paul (2008). Political terminology. Berlin: Walter

de Gruyter.

Van Dijk, T. (1989). Language, perception, communication. Moscow:

Progress.

Gallie, Walter B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings

of the aristotelian Society 56: 167– 198.

Issers, O.S. (2008). Communicative strategies and tactics of russian

speech. Moscow: URSS, LKI.

Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics. Semantics, pragmatics,

presupposition, and focus. Malden Oxford: Blackwell.

Leontev, A.A. (2005). Word in speech activity. Moscow, 2005.

Levin, R, McCornack, A.(2014). Theorizing about deception. Journal of language

and social psychological.

Malyuga, E.N. etal (2018) Linguistic pragmatics of intercultural

professional and business communication. Switzerland: Springer

Oesch, N. (2016). Deception as a derived function of language. Frontiers

in Psychology journal. Published online on 2016 Sep 27.

https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01485

International Publishing AG.

Pelz, J. (1981). Theoretical foundations of semiotics, American

Journal of Semiotics 1.1-2, 15 45

______. (1982). Semiotic and non semiotic concepts of

meaning, American Journal of Semiotics 1.4, 1 19.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

' Jawad Almagsosi , A., & H. Alghezzy , K. . (2021). A Study of Manipulation in Some Selected Reports. Journal of College of Education, 2(42), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss42.2101