Investigating the Correlation Between Iraqi EFL Secondary School Students’ Willingness to Communicate and Their Writing Performance"

نویسندگان

  • Dr. Balqees Hameedi Kadhim General Directorate of Education in Wasit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol60.Iss1.4417

کلمات کلیدی:

SL/FL secondary students, Willingness to communicate (WTC), Self- Perceived Communication Competence (STCC)

چکیده

Due to the significance of foreign language learning and its crucial role in fostering meaningful and effective communication, contemporary language learning pedagogy places considerable emphasis on learners’ willingness to communicate within foreign language classes, viewing it as a key indicator of their engagement and language acquisition. Therefore, this research aims to explore the correlation between the Iraqi EFL secondary school students’ willingness to communicate and their writing performance. To fulfil the objectives of the study, a sample of (100) female fourth-grade students were chosen randomly from three public secondary school, during the academic year 2024/2025. To collect and analyze data, two instruments were employed: a questionnaire adopted from Weaver (2005) and writing performance test. The results achieved indicate that Iraqi EFL secondary students show a greater willingness to communicate when working on writing tasks. 

دانلودها

دسترسی به دانلود اطلاعات مقدور نیست.

مراجع

- Alsamadani, H. A. (2010). The relationship between Saudi EFL students' writing competence, L1 writing proficiency, and self-regulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 53-63.

- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845

- Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction [Electronic Version]. System, 480-493. Retrieved March 2009, from www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ800634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002

- Cao, Y. (2009). An ecological view of situational willingness to communicate in a second language classroom. In H. Chen & K. Cruickshank (Eds.), Making a difference: Challenges for applied linguistics (pp. 199–218). Newcastle-upon-Tyne,

England: Cambridge Scholars Press.

- Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second

language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016

- Cetinkaya, Y. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Unpublished M. A. Thesis, Ohio: The Ohio State University, USA).

- Clément, R., Baker, S.C., & MacIntyre, P.D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03022002003

- Fassinger, P. A. (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students’ and professors’ contributions to students’ silence. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 82-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1995.11774758

- Gere, A. R. (Ed.). (1985). Roots in the sawdust: Writing to learn across the disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

- Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G.H., & Asadpour, S.F. (2012). Willingness to Communicate in English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438538

- Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004

- Leather, J., & Van Dam, J. (2003). Towards an ecology of language acquisition. In J. Leather & J. van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0341-3_1

- MacIntyre, P.D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001

- MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: Asituational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

- MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037

- MacLeod, C., & Fraser, J. B. (2010). Development, validation and application of a modified Arabic translation of the What Is Happening in This Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environment Research, 13, 105–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9052-5

- McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1982). Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal, 33, 458–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978209388452

- McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association. Denver. CO.

- McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, m40, 16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817

- Molberg, H., K., K. 2010. The Consequence of Motivation and Linguistic Self-Confidence in Relation to Pupils’ Oral Interaction. (Un published M. A. Thesis). Tromso: Universitetet i Tromso.

- Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02011.x

- Öz, F. (2006). Uygulamalı Türkçe ögretimi. (Gelistirilmis 3. baskı). Ankara: Anı yayıncılık.

- Peng, J. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40, 203–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002

- Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey. J. C. (1989). Willingness to communicate and dysfunctional communication processes. In C. V. Roberts, & K. W. Watson (Eds.), Interpersonal communication processes (pp. 292-318). New Orleans, LA: SPECTRA Inc.

- Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4thEd.). London: Longman.

- White, R., & McGovern, D. (1994). Writing: A student’s book. English for Academic Study Series. Hemel Hempstead (Hertfordshire): Prentice Hall Europe.

- Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affection willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x

دانلودها

چاپ شده

2025-08-10

نحوه استناد به مقاله

Dr. Balqees Hameedi Kadhim. (2025). Investigating the Correlation Between Iraqi EFL Secondary School Students’ Willingness to Communicate and Their Writing Performance". Journal of College of Education, 60(1), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol60.Iss1.4417