A Study of Manipulation in Some Selected Reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss42.2101Keywords:
Manipulation, direct and indirect manipulation, language, covert and negative intention.Abstract
The current study is concerned with Manipulation as one of the important linguistic phenomena. Manipulation is a linguistic term with great creative potential that is first and foremost topical in the framework of the theory of linguistic manipulation. The widespread and blurry semantic filed of ‘manipulation’ includes the key elements like the speaker’s negative and covert intention that is not evident for the listener.
The study aims at showing the concept of manipulation, its types and the use of manipulation in two reports concerning Golan Heights presented by CNN and RT.
The study adopts an eclectic model of analysis, Malyuga and et al, 2018, Issers, 2008 and Leontive, 1999 . The study concludes that manipulation is divided into five main types according to: the nature of subject-object interaction, awareness of verbal actions, the type of speech acts, nature of recipient’s response in addition to the objective focus of manipulative efforts. There is a great similarity in the use of manipulation and its types in both reports. The only difference between them is in terms of the ‘nature of subject-object interaction’ that CNN uses direct 100% while RT uses direct and indirect manipulation equally 50%.
Downloads
References
Asya, R. (2017). Linguistic manipulation: definition and types.
University of Rostov.
Blass, R. (2002). Manipulation in the speeches and writings of hitler
and the NSDAP. Paper delivered at the International Conference
on Manipulation in the Totalitarian Regimes of the Century,
Ascona, Switzerland.
Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul (2008). Political terminology. Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter.
Van Dijk, T. (1989). Language, perception, communication. Moscow:
Progress.
Gallie, Walter B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings
of the aristotelian Society 56: 167– 198.
Issers, O.S. (2008). Communicative strategies and tactics of russian
speech. Moscow: URSS, LKI.
Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics. Semantics, pragmatics,
presupposition, and focus. Malden Oxford: Blackwell.
Leontev, A.A. (2005). Word in speech activity. Moscow, 2005.
Levin, R, McCornack, A.(2014). Theorizing about deception. Journal of language
and social psychological.
Malyuga, E.N. etal (2018) Linguistic pragmatics of intercultural
professional and business communication. Switzerland: Springer
Oesch, N. (2016). Deception as a derived function of language. Frontiers
in Psychology journal. Published online on 2016 Sep 27.
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01485
International Publishing AG.
Pelz, J. (1981). Theoretical foundations of semiotics, American
Journal of Semiotics 1.1-2, 15 45
______. (1982). Semiotic and non semiotic concepts of
meaning, American Journal of Semiotics 1.4, 1 19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Alia ' Jawad Almagsosi , Khalida H. Alghezzy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
