استقصاء الفروق بين الجنسين في استعمال استراتيجيات التدريس في تعليم اللغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية في السياق الكردي

• Al-khatib, B. A. (2012). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem- Solving Skills among Female Students in Princess Alia University College. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2, 29-38

• Alberta Learning. (2002). Focus on inquiry: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Inquiry-Based Learning. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Learning.

• Ali, S. M. & Krish, P. (2016). Gender-Specific English Language Use of Malaysian Blog Authors. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 21-35.

• Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

• Anshori, D. S. (2016). Gender cognition in Religious Discourse: A Study of framing in thematic Holy Koran interpretation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistic, 6(1), 88-98.

• Azis, R. A., Jin, C. C., & Nordin, N. M. (2016). The Use of Interactional Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

• Burck, C. (2011). Living in Several Languages: Language, Gender and Identities. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(4), 361 –378.

• Cabaysa, C. C. (2010). Language Learning Strategies of Students at Different Levels of Speaking Proficiency. Education Quarterly, 68(1), 16-35.

• Clarke, V. & Braun, V., 2018. Using Thematic Analysis in Counselling and Psychotherapy Research: A Critical Reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2).

• El-Emadi et al. (2019). Teaching Style Differences between Male and Female Science Teachers in Qatari schools: Possible Impact on Student Achievement’, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), p. em1800. doi:10.29333/ejmste/109236.

• Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching Thinking skills: Theory and Practice. New York: W. H. Freeman.

• Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Martin, R.L., 2023. Strategy in 1,000 words. [online] Available at: https://rogerlmartin.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/6-13-2023-red---roger-martin---strategy-in-1000-words.pdf [Accessed 3 September 2025].

• Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching Thinking: Philosophical Inquiry in the Classroom. London: Continuum.

• Harmer, J. (2007) How to Teach English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

• Hassan, I. H. (2000). Language, Gender, and Power: Analysis of Theme and Topic Management in Arabic Conversational Discourse. The Humanities and Social.

• Issac, Jerin C. (2010). Methods and Strategies of Teaching: An overview. Pondicherry University Press.

• Kato, S. (2009). The Relationship of Language Learning Strategies and Personality on English Proficiency in Japanese University Students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(1), 141-162.

• Khmakhien, A. (2012). Demystifying Thai EFL Learners’ Perceptual Learning Style Preferences. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(1), 61-74.

• Killen, R. (2016). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice. 7th ed. Melbourne: Cengage Learning.

• Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.

• Meta-discourse in the Construction of Gender Identities among Malaysian ESL Learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 207-220

• Oxford, R. L. (Ed.) (1996). Language learning Strategies Around the World: Cross- Cultural Perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

• Oxford, R. L. & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessment the Use of Language Learning Strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL Version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.

• Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning strategies by University Students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 166-174.

• Park, G. & French, B. F. (2011). Beyond the mean Differences of the SILL by Gender: Differential Item Functioning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 175-203.

• Park, G. & French, B. F. (2011). Beyond the Mean Differences of the SILL by Gender: Differential Item Functioning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 175-203.

• Richards, J.C. and Rodgers, T.S. (2014) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Roohani, A. & Zarei, M. (2013). Evaluating Gender-Bias in the Iranian pre-university English Textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 115-125. Science, 61, 591.

• Seyyed rezaie, Z. S. & Vahedi, V. S. (2017). Projecting Gender Identity Through Meta-discourse. Marking: Investigating Writers’ Stance taking in Written Discourse. Indonesian journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 301-310.

• Tam, K. (2013). A study on Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) of University Students in Hong Kong (Unpublished Thesis). The University of Hong Kong.

• Tam, K. (2013). A Study on Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) of University Students in Hong Kong (Unpublished Thesis). The University of Hong Kong.

• Viriya, C. & Sapsirin, S. (2014). Gender differences in Language Learning Style Language Learning Strategies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 77- 88. Retrieved on 22 September 2015.

• Wang, L. (2009). An Empirical Study of Differences in the Use of English Vocabulary Learning Strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(4), 151-192.

• Wehrli, G., Nyquist, J.G. (2003). Creating an Educational Curriculum for Learners at Any Level. AABB Conference.