Arbitration Treaty between the United States and the Netherlands Palmas Island Affair Miangas a model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss47.3068Abstract
The Although the historical study of the issue of arbitration in international relations falls within the framework of the specialization and academic interest of the author in the field of diplomatic history and the history of international relations, it is another turning point and interest that reinforces his previous studies in this field, as he presents for the first time historical studies in another field One of the fields of study of the history of international relations, which is the field of historical legal studies, in addition to that the research gives evidence and examples from the experiences of international arbitration, and thus from documenting the link between history and law, the study of the development of laws and evidence of arbitration provides historical studies of important legal issues that contribute to spreading and increasing awareness of the law On the other hand, the researcher confirms the importance of the issue of arbitration in international relations and the area of interest that he occupied within the framework of these relations, in addition to that, the American historical document remained present in this research because of its importance in the research for the ideas, information and trends it presents.
Downloads
References
Island of Palmas Case to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American؛ SCRIBD, Island of Palmas Case, Uploaded byJuly Senining Ursonal.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas case (Or miangas),United Of America and the Netherlands, Arbitrator M. Huber, The Hague, 4 April 1928.
Island of Palmas Case to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American.
∙ ماكس هوبر Max Huber : لا تزال أفضل مساهمة لهوبر في مجال التحكيم وهي حكمه عام 1928 في قضية جزيرة بالماس ، مشهورة كواحدة من الحالات الرائدة في مجال التحكيم الدولي. على الرغم من أنها أقل شهرة إلى حد ما ، إلا أن الحالة الثانية التي عمل فيها هوبر كمحكم وحيد (المطالبات البريطانية في المنطقة الإسبانية بالمغرب 1923-1925) ، كانت بمثابة إحدى السوابق الرئيسية في عمل لجنة القانون الدولي بشأن مسؤولية الدولة. بالذهاب إلى ما هو أبعد من القضايا التقنية (والهامشية) المعرضة للخطر . لم يكتف هوبر بالتفاوض والتوقيع على معاهدة التحكيم والتوفيق السويسرية الألمانية لعام 1921 ، بل طُلب منه أيضًا الجلوس على منصة قضية اختطاف جاكوب سالومون (1935) التي أُنشئت بموجب شروط تلك المعاهدة بالذات. على الرغم من عدم إصدار قرار تحكيم رسمي ، إلا أن هذه القضية تعد مثالًا رئيسيًا على الضغط الذي يمكن أن يطبقه مجرد وجود إجراء تحكيم حتى على الأنظمة الديكتاتورية.
()OXFORD ACADEMIC, Eurpean Journal of International Law,Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Max Huber as Arbitrator: The Palmas (Miangas) Case and Other Arbitrations, European Journal of International Law, Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages 145–170(.)
OXFORD ACADEMIC, Eurpean Journal of International Law,Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Max Huber as Arbitrator: The Palmas (Miangas) Case and Other Arbitrations, European Journal of International Law, Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages 145–170.
OXFORD ACADEMIC, Eurpean Journal of International Law,Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Max Huber as Arbitrator: The Palmas (Miangas) Case and Other Arbitrations, European Journal of International Law, Volume 18, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages 145–170.
رفيق الجرجاوي، أسانيد طرفي النـزاع في ميزان القانون الدولي، الامارات اليوم 16 يونيو 2008 .
رفيق الجرجاوي، أسانيد طرفي النـزاع في ميزان القانون الدولي، الامارات اليوم 16 يونيو 2008 .
The Permanent Court of Arbitration.
F.R.U.S, 1925, VOLUME II,Treaty Between the United States of America and the Netherlands, Signed at Washington, January 23, 1925.
F.R.U.S, 1925, VOLUME II,Treaty Between the United States of America and the Netherlands, Signed at Washington, January 23, 1925.
رفيق الجرجاوي، أسانيد طرفي النـزاع في ميزان القانون الدولي، الامارات اليوم 16 يونيو 2008 .
Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas case (Or miangas),United Of America and the Netherlands, Arbitrator M. Huber, The Hague, 4 April 1928.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration.
Island of Palmas Case to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American W
Island of Palmas Case to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas case (Or miangas),United Of America and the Netherlands, Arbitrator M. Huber, The Hague, 4 April 1928.
F.R.U.S,, 1928, VOLUME III, The Netherlands Minister ( Van Royen ) to the Secretary of State, Washington , June 27, 1928 .( 711.5612a/6).
F.R.U.S,, 1928, VOLUME III, The Netherlands Minister ( Van Royen ) to the Secretary of State, Washington , June 27, 1928 .( 711.5612a/6).
F.R.U.S,, 1928, VOLUME III,The Netherlands Minister ( Van Royen ) to the Secretary of State, Washington , June 27, 1928 .( 711.5612a/6).
The Netherlands Minister ( Van Royen ) to the Secretary of State 2, Washington , May 9, 1929. ( 711.5612a/27).
Island of Palmas Case to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) after Spain's defeat in the Spanish-American.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas case (Or miangas),United Of America and the Netherlands, Arbitrator M. Huber, The Hague, 4 April 1928.
F.R.US, 1935, THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH; EUROPE, VOLUME II,711.5614/300,The Netherland Minister ( Van Haersma de With ) to the Secretary of State, Washington , 10 July, 1935.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Prof. Dr.: Ibrahim Saeed Al-Baydani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
