A Pragmatic Study of the Abuse of Language in Orwell’s Novel: Nineteen Eighty-Four.


  • Tabarak Abdul- Hussein Turkey College of Education, University of Wasit, Iraq
  • Mazin Jasim Al- Hilu College of Literary, University of Wasit, Iraq




Keywords: Power, ideology. pragmatics, Grice’s Theory of Implicature and Cooperative Principle.


This research is concerned with analysing pragmatically the abuse of language upon people. The analysis focuses on the British novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four” by George Orwell. This study aims at analysing the language used in the novel and showing how it can be used as an oppressive device that can be abused to lead to a totalitarian state. The model of analysis that is used in the current study is Grice’s theory of implicature and the cooperative principles (1975). The researcher employs qualitative method to have deep understanding and examination to the data of the present study. The results of this research reveal that pragmatic analysis shows that language can be used as a tool to spread power and authority. It can lead to a whole totalitarianism when those in power imply their aims and intuitions in the words they use. The implied meaning occurs when the speaker does not use the language directly and violates the relevance, the manner, the quality and the quantity maxims and being uncooperative. The study also shows the role and power that the language has upon the thought and behaviour of people.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...



Abraham, S. (2016). Pragmatics: Historical Development, Scope and Subject Matter or Object of Study. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research. 3(12), 37-43.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijamr.2016.03.12.007

Amberg, J.S. & Vause, D.J. (2009). What is language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asya, A. (2013). LINGUISTIC MANIPULATION: DEFINITION AND TYPES. International Journal of Cognitive Research in science, engineering and education, 1(2). South Federal University, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Retrieved from: rsu-akopova@yandex.ru

Berkes, J. (2000). Language as the ‘Ultimate Weapon’ in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Retrieved

from http://www.berkes.ca/archive/berkes_1984_language.html.

Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Crystal, D. (1987 ). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

David, M. (2017). Language, Power and Manipulation: The Use of Rhetoric in Maintaining

Managerial Influence. ResearchGate. Retrieved from:


Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Paradigmatic Controversies and Contradictions: Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Elbarbary, S. (1992). Language as Theme in Animal Farm. Kuwait University.

Finsen, S. (2016). The power of language: language policies of international institutions (master thesis). Reykjavík, Ísland.

Greenblatt, S.J. (1974). "Orwell as Satirist." In George Orwell. A Collection of Critical Essays, 1011 -18. Edited by Raymond Williams. Englewood Cliffs NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hossain, M. (2017). Language as the Device for Psychological Manipulation in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Psychological Linguistic Analysis. European Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research 5(8), 25-31.

Hama, B. (2015). Language as an oppressive device in Orwell's 1984. ResearchGate. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331559473

Hodge, B., & Fowler, R. (1979). Orwellian linguistics. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew (Eds.). Language and control (pp. 6–25). London: Routledge.


Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. (1997) Pragmatics. 3rd.ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lupyan, G.; Bergen, B. (2015). How Language Programs the Mind. Topics in Cognitive

Science. 1-17. Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Lutz. W. (1987). Beyond Nineteen Eighty-Four: Doublespeak in a Post-Orwellian Age. National Council of Teachers of English, Kenyon Rd., Urbana.

Orwell, G. (1961). Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York: New American Library.

Rahv, Philip (1963). ‘The Unfuture of utopia in Nineteen Eighty-Four’ [1949], in Irving

Howe (ed.), Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: Text, Sources and Criticism. New York:

Harcourt, Brace & World, 181–185.

Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative Research: A Personal Skills Aproach. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.

Verschueren, J . & Ostman, J. (2009). Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John


Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language (2nd Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.




How to Cite

Abdul- Hussein Turkey , T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., & Jasim Al- Hilu, M. . . (2020). A Pragmatic Study of the Abuse of Language in Orwell’s Novel: Nineteen Eighty-Four. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 2(39), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss39.1430