Looks at the glossary of common mistakes of critic Adnani

Abstract

      There is no doubt that the language correction movement has numerous and beneficial effects in achieving a lofty goal, a noble goal in preserving the integrity of the language, refining it from impurities of error and melody, informing the general and special areas of defects in linguistic use, and alerting the places where writers, preachers, and poets leave Language controls, rules, and origins, but a group of those who made those efforts in the old and the modern hastened or tightened, so some of its men mistook the eloquent use of desire to use the most eloquent, and faulted the correct few, and they responded to what is not suitable for its response in terms of formulas and structures, so the ancient linguists cautioned of this matter As we see with Ibn Jani in his saying: “It should not be called something that has an existing aspect of Arabic, and if someone else is stronger than it is a mistake” this saying is summed up by what we are dealing with from following some of what was mentioned by Professor Muhammad Al-Adnani in his dictionary. In common mistakes, let's return what went wrong in one of the most eloquent aspects of language use