تحليل لغوي ادراكي لتمثيلات المسلمين في جريدة :The Times  احتجاجات برمنكهام، 2019ومقتل باتي ، 2020

Authors

  • Sabra Hasan Ghanim Master Candidate at Mustansiriyah university
  • Prof.Ahmed Qadoury Abed Mustansiriyah Universty, College of Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol55.Iss1.3217

Keywords:

cognitive analysis, ideology, Muslim representation, proximization , The Times

Abstract

This paper studies how linguistic choices are utilized in the press to achieve particular conceptualizations in the reader's mind. It aims to explore how The Times represents Muslims in its news reports. The data is analysed qualitatively by adopting Hart's model of proximization (2014) as a conceptual parameter through which ideology and legitimacy are enacted in the reports. The findings show that as a strategy of interventionist discourse, proximization is exploited to present Muslims as a threat to the self by emphasizing Us vs Them Polarization. A significant finding is that as a right-wing organization, The Times represents Muslims in a way that reflects an extreme-nationalist debate interdiscursively associated with discourses of “the war on terror” by relying on proximization strategy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Abed, A. Q. (2016). Anti-prophet Muhammad media. Lampert.

Ali, S. k. (2021). A comparative cognitive linguistic study of Iraqi Arabic and American English persuasive strategies in selected e-advertisements. University of Baghdad. (MA thesis)

Allen (2010). Islamophobia. Ashgate.

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press 1998–2009. Cambridge University Press.

Brescoll, V., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15(8), 515-520.

Cap, P. (2006). Legitimisation in political discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Cap, P. (2008). Towards a Proximisation Model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1), 17-41.

Cap, P. (2010). Proximizing objects, Proximizing values: Towards an axiological contribution to the discourse of legitimization. In U. Okulska & P. Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse (pp. 119- 42). Benjamins.

Cap, P. (2011). Axiological proximisation. In C. Hart (Ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 81-96). Benjamins.

Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Benjamins.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Chomsky, N. (1989). Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. Pluto Press.

Dietrich, S., Heider, D., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2006). Influence of newspaper reporting on adolescents’ attitudes toward people with mental illness. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(4), 318-322.

Fadil, N. (2011). "Islamophobia and the role of the progressive left". In 'Islamophobia and progressive values. Proceedings of IIR Seminar (1) 'End the Isolation: building solidarity networks against Islamophobia in Europe'. The Institute of Race Relations.

Fairclough, N. (2009) Language and globalization. Semiotica,173, (1-4) 317-342.

Gibson, O. (2003). Sales dip may push mirror under 2m: Morgan accepts war stance could reduce circulation to 70-year low. The Guardian.

Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Palgrave.

Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hart, C. (Ed.). (2020). Researching discourse: A student guide. Routledge.

Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave.

Lido, C., Brown, R., Samson, A., & Calitri, R. (2006). Effects of the media priming asylum-seeker stereotypes on thoughts and behaviour. Economic and Social Research Council.

Marlow, C. R. (2011). Research methods for generalist social work. Cengage Learning.

Oxford Royal Academy. (n.d.). Black and White and Read All Over: A Guide to British Newspapers. https://www.oxford-royale.com/articles/a-guide-to-british-newspapers/

Reah, D. (2002). The language of newspapers (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Benjamins.

Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of latinos in contemporary American public discourse. University of Texas Press.

Sparks, C. (1999). The press. In J. Stokes & A. Reading (Eds.), The media in Britain: Current debates and developments (pp. 41–60). Macmillan.

Taira, T., Poole, E., & Knott, K. (2013). Religion in the British media today. In J. Mitchell & O. Gower (Eds.), Religion and the news (pp. 31-44). Ashgate.

van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power, and access. Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, H. E. Hamilton & D. Tannen (Ed.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). (pp. 466-485). John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-20

How to Cite

Sabra Hasan Ghanim, & Abed, A. Q. A. (2024). تحليل لغوي ادراكي لتمثيلات المسلمين في جريدة :The Times  احتجاجات برمنكهام، 2019ومقتل باتي ، 2020. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 55(1), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol55.Iss1.3217