The Presidential Debates between Trump and Biden: A Rhetorical Analysis

Authors

  • Israa Falih Jasim University Wasit, College of Education
  • Khalida Al Ghezzy University Wasit, College of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol49.Iss2.3349

Keywords:

البلاغة, الخطاب السياسي , البلاغة و الخطاب السياسي, المناظرات الرئاسية.

Abstract

    The current study discusses a rhetorical analysis of the  presidential debates that take place between Trump and Biden, it focuses on exploring the various rhetorical strategies used by candidates to win political elections. The study aims to analyze the debates in order to know the rhetorical strategies through which politicians try to justify their ideas and convince their audience about their electoral campaigns. The study relies on the qualitative approach by applying Corbett's strategies(1965), as a basic framework for analysis. The results show that the candidates used various rhetorical strategies to convince the people  about their political plans. They used irony as a device of convincing that the competitor is an  incompetent to lead the country and thus enhance the chances of winning the elections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Bitzer, L. F. (1968). Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy &Rhetoric, (1): 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Booth, W. (2004) The Rhetoric of Rhetoric. Blackwell.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Corbett, E. P. J.(1965). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. Oxford University Press.

David, M. (2014). Language, Power and Manipulation: The Use of Rhetoric in Maintaining Political Influence. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 5(1), 164–170.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th Ed.).Sage Publications Ltd.

Metcalfe, S. (1998). Building a Speech. The Harcourt Press. Ghadessy.

Sharndama, E. (2016). Discursive strategies in political speech: A critical discourse analysis of selected inaugural speeches of the 2015 Nigeria’s Guberna Torial inaugurals, European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(2), 15-28.

Stuckey, M.E. (2010). jimmy Carter, Human Rights, and Instrumental Effects of Presidential Rhetoric. In Parry-Giles, S. J. & Hogan, J. M. (Eds.). The handbook of rhetoric and public address (Vol. 5). John Wiley & Sons.‏

Walton, D.( 2007). Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge University press.

Wilson, J. (2001). Political Discourse. In Shiffrin, D. Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H,E. (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (p.410).Blackwell.

Wodak, R. (2012). Politics as Usual: Invistigating Poltical Discourse in Action. In J. P. Gee., & M. Handford (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 525-540). Routledge.

Zarracina, J. Zaiets, k. Procell, C. (October 23,2020). How Biden and Trump compared in the final presidential debate. USA Today. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3733474001

Published

2023-01-01 — Updated on 2023-01-06

Versions

How to Cite

Israa Falih Jasim, & Khalida Al Ghezzy. (2023). The Presidential Debates between Trump and Biden: A Rhetorical Analysis. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 49(2), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol49.Iss2.3349 (Original work published 2023)