كفاية الاتصال الاكاديمي لدى طلبة الدراسات العليا

أ.م.د علي عناد زامل

doi:10.31185/eduj.Vol61.Iss2.4679

Authors

Dr.Ali ENAD ZAMlL Wasit University / College of Education for Human Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol61.Iss2.4679

Keywords:

Academic Communication،Students، graduate studies

Abstract

The current study aims to identify the level of academic communication competence among graduate students and to determine the significance of differences in academic communication scores according to the variables of specialization and type of study. To achieve the research objectives, the researcher developed a scale consisting of 24 items based on Erickson's (2019) definition of academic communication. The psychometric properties of the scale were extracted; validity indicators were verified through two methods: face validity and construct validity. Reliability coefficients were also calculated, with a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.94 and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84, both considered statistically acceptable. The results indicated that graduate students possess a moderate level of academic communication competence. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference according to the specialization variable, favoring the humanities, while no significant difference was found concerning the type of study. The study concluded with a set of recommendations and future suggestions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• الشجيري، ياسر خلف والزهيري، حيدر عبد الكريم (2022): اتجاهات حديثة في القياس والتقويم النفسي والتربوي، دار الاعصار العالمي للنشر والتوزيع، الاردن.

• عباس، محمد خليل ونوفل، محمد بكر والعبسي، محمد مصطفى وابو عواد، بكر نوفل (2007): مدخل الى مناهج البحث في التربية وعلم النفس ، ط1، دار المسيرة لنشر والتوزيع، عمان.

• عليوي، علي عبدالرضا (2023): الصلابة الاكاديمية لدى طلبة المرحلة الاعدادية المتميزين. مجلة كلية التربية. العدد (53) المجلد (2). ص. 451-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol53.Iss2.3769

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The craft of research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo25051817.

• Duff, P. A. (2022). Case study research in applied linguistics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183926.

• Erikson, P. (2019). Academic communication in theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12345-6.

• Fisher, A. (2019). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

• Harris, M. (2022). Writing in the Disciplines. Bedford/St. Martin's.

• Hyland, K. (2016). Academic Publishing (p. 45). Oxford.

• Hyland, K. (2018). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165215.

• Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003

• Morrison, J., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2021). Designing Effective Instruction (9th ed.). Wiley.

• Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2020). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for students and their supervisors (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367340954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170022

• Pecorari, D. (2020). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use (2nd ed.). Open University Press. https://www.mheducation.co.uk/teaching-to-avoid-plagiarism-9780335262028-emea-group.

• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://press.umich.edu/Books/A/Academic-Writing-for-Graduate-Students-Third-Edition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936

• UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021/2: Non-state actors in education: Who chooses? Who loses? UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/YTJT5864