(The multiple narrations of the witness and their effect on the grammatical ruling - Al-Baghdadis works as an example)

Abstract

Grammar relies in its evidence on hearing and analogy as principles and foundations in grammatical codification, and this is built on poetic evidence. It has been said that the evidence in grammar is grammar; therefore, grammarians relied on it in the argument for grammatical phenomena, and divided the layers of argument into four layers (the layer of the pre-Islamic, the pre-Islamic, the Islamic, and the modern), and they determined the era of argument to the poet Ibrahim bin Harmah 150 AH, and some of them expanded and went beyond this determination. Al-Baghdadi undertook to study poetic evidence in an extensive study in his encyclopedic works, and tracked the evidence of Al-Radhi, Ibn Al-Wardi, and Ibn Hisham, as he studied the evidence in a study that expresses the extent of his scientific ability, the breadth of his knowledge, and his immersion in the field of linguistic evidence. Among those phenomena that received the share of his comments is the multiplicity of the narration of the evidence, as it is narrated in different ways; which leads to a change in the grammatical ruling;  According to the change in the witnesss narration, he would indicate the preference of this narration over that, and that over another, and I developed a desire to write a research that I called (The multiple narrations of the witness and their effect on the grammatical ruling - Al-Baghdadis works as an example).