A Semiotic Study of the Importance of some Selected Images of the Iraqi English Curricula

Authors

  • Asst.lect.Bushra Abdul -Taj Abdul-Ameer Ministry of Education Educational Opening College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol53.Iss2.3756

Keywords:

Semiotics , Importance ,Images , English , Iraq , Curricula

Abstract

This study is dealt with a semiotic analysis of some selected images of the Iraqi English curriculum. The study adopts Barthes (1977) Visual Rhetoric and Eco (2003) Decoding and Encoding theory. The Semiotic Study presents the analysis of both verbal and nonverbal messages. The major aims of this study; is to clarify the importance of the signs, symbols and hints in images and text of iraqi English curriculum and how can they serve teaching and educational operation. As well, the reason behind choosing the images of curriculum, is that because of having a great effect in teaching operation that can attract student's attention by many things such as; colors, signs and symbols. Consequently, the topic of this study can get the attention and interest of students and the result not only having new vocabularies but having moral lessons and forming sentences. Semiotic study is chosen because it is the science that the studies signs and its functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. (2000). Channels of discourse, reassembled television and

contemporary criticism. Routledge.

Allen, G. (2003) Roland Barthes. Routledge.

Barthes, Roland. (1977) Image-music-text .Fontana

Carnap, R. (1942) Introduction to Semantics. Harvard University Press.

Culler, J. (1983) Barthes: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An Introduction to Systemic Functional

Linguistics. 2nd ed. Verso. Print.

Eco, U. (2003). Mouse or Rat: translation as negotiation. Weidenield &Nicolson.

Krampen, M. (1987). Classics of Semiotics: Ferdinand de Saussure and the Development of Semiology. Plenum Press.

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1990). Reading images Geelong. Deakin.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1993). Semiotics and communication: Signs, codes,

cultures. University Press

Mitchell, W.J.T. (1986). Iconology, image, text, ideology. The University of Chicago Press

Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Routledge.

Nöth, W. (1990) Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (1959) Course in General Linguistics (trans. Wade Baskin). Philosophical Library.

Sloan, T., Gregg, R., Nilsen, T., Rein, I., Simons, H., Stelzner, H., & Zacharias, D. (1971). Report of the Committee of the Advancement and Refinement of Rhetorical Criticism. In: Bitzer, L. F. and Black, E. (Eds.). The Prospect of Rhetoric: Report of the National Developmental Project (pp. 220-227). Prentice-Hall.

Shaumyan, S. (1987) A Semiotic Theory of Language. Indiana University Press.

Thorson, E. & Mendelson, A. (2001). Public Perceptions of News Stories and News Photos of Hillary Clinton. News Photographer, 56(10), 4-10.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-25

How to Cite

Asst.lect.Bushra Abdul -Taj Abdul-Ameer. (2023). A Semiotic Study of the Importance of some Selected Images of the Iraqi English Curricula. Journal of College of Education, 53(2), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol53.Iss2.3756