A Socio-pragmatic Study of the Speech Act of Divorce in Religious and Legislative Discourse

Authors

  • Maha Hani Zaidan College of Education, University of Wasit, Iraq
  • Hashim Aliwy Mohammed جامعة واسط/ كلية التربية

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol4.Iss41.1943

Keywords:

: divorce, pragmatics, felicity conditions, cooperative principle

Abstract

          Linguistic studies attempt to cover all issues, whether social, legal, linguistic, medical or even technological. Since social issues are the most important issues that need to be focused on, this study is devoted to analyse one distinctive social issue i.e., divorce Hence, divorce, as a main important social issue, is a controversial topic, since it varies among religions and cultures, in addition to its different legislations among countries. Therefore, this study attempts to analyse socio-pragmatically the speech act of divorce in religious and legislative texts, namely, the Quranic and Biblical texts and legislations of both Iraq and Britain. This study aims to examine the socio-pragmatic factors that influence divorce in religious and legislative texts and to compare between the two languages in terms of divorce socio-pragmatically in religious and legal laws. The researchers use a qualitative method of research. The model employed in this study is that of Austin’s felicity conditions (1965) and Grice’s cooperative principle (1975). The results of this study reveal that socio-pragmatic factors have an essential role on affecting, performing and expressing divorce across religions and cultures. It is also found that the same speech act is performed differently across cultures employing different felicity conditions while submitting to the same maxims with different results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ali, A. Y.(1937). The Holy Quran: Arabic Text with an English Translation and Commentary. Lahore: Ripon Printing Press.

Alhussaini, H., Abbas,N. & Abed, A.(2017). Divorce as a Performative Speech Act: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of the college of education. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321170659_Divorce_as_a_Performative_Speech_Act_A_Cross-Cultural_Study.

Audi, R.(Ed.). (1999). Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy ( 2nd Ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press.

Austin, J., (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L.,f.(1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blum –Kulka, S.& Olshtain, E.(1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross- Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 196-213.

Blunter, R. & Zeevat, H.(Ed). (2004). Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. United States, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K.(1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method. United States of America: Pearson.

Brueggemann, W. (1997). Theology of the Old Testament, Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis. MN: Fortress.

Conway, H. L. (2007). Family Law: Key Cases. Great Britain: Hodder Education, Hachette Livre UK,

Crabtree, B.F. & Miller, W. L.(1999). Doing Qualitative Research, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell,J.W., (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Cudon, J.,A., Habib, M.,A., Birchwood, M., Velickovic, V., Dines, M., Fiske, S.(2013). A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (5th Ed).UK: Wiley- Blackwell.

Collis, J., Hussey, R. & Hussey, J.(2003). Business Research: A Practical Guide to Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, (2nd Edit). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Davis, J.(2015). Evangelical ethics. Phillipsburg , NJ: P&R Publishing.

Deniz, N.K. &Lincolin, Y. S.(2000). Introduction. In N.K. Deniz, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ellece, S.& Baker,P.(2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.

Family Law Act 1996 UK Public General Act. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/27/contents

Fraser, B.(1981). On Apologizing. In Coulmas,F.(Ed). Conversational Routine. Mouton: The Hague.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Studies in the Way of Words. London: Harvard University Press.

Holmes, J.(2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th Ed). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Katz, S. N. (2003). Family Law in America. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Kitzinger, C.(1987). The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.

Kess, J.(1992). Psycholinguistics and Study of Natural Language. Amsterdam: Benjamin Publishing Press.

Khalil, A. M.(1999). A Contrastive Grammar of English and Arabic. Jordan: Jordan Book Centre.

Lyons, J.(1977). Semantics: Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lepore , C. R. (2012). Asserting State sovereignty over national communities of Islam in the United States and Britain: Sharia Courts as a tool of Muslim accommodation and integration. Washington University global studies law review, 11(3) 669-692 Retrieved from https:// openscholarship.wustl.Edu/law_globalstudies/vol11/isss3/4

McGoldrick, M., Pearce, J., & Giordano, J. (1982). Ethnicity and Family Therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

Murdock, M.(2018). Women and Men in the Qur’an. Washington: Library of Congress.

Paltridge, B.(2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed). UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Parker ,F.(1986). Linguistics for Non-Linguists. London: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

Petrus, K.(Ed). (2010). Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Putz, M.& Aertselaer, J.(Ed).(2008). Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross Cultural Perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyer.

Rankema, J.(1993). Discourse Study, an Introductory Textbook. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rapoport, Y. (2005). Marriage, Money and Divorce in Medieval Islamic Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robins, R. H. (1964). General Linguistics : An Introductory Survey. London: Longmans.

Samovar, A. L., Porter, E. R., & McDaniel, R. E.(2010). Communication Between Cultures(7th Ed). USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of Semantic Structure. England : Peking University Press, Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, M. (1987). “The Grammar of Conduct: Speech Act Theory and Education of Emma Woodhouse”. Style. Vol.12, No.4357

Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. USA, UK: Wiely-Blackwell.

Wardhaugh, R.& Fuller, J., M.(2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th Ed). UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Weigand, E.(Ed). (2008). Dialogue and Rhetoric. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wild, S. E., (2006). Webster’s New World Law Dictionary. Canada: Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-05

How to Cite

Hani Zaidan , M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., & Aliwy Mohammed , H. . (2020). A Socio-pragmatic Study of the Speech Act of Divorce in Religious and Legislative Discourse. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 4(41), 601-622. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol4.Iss41.1943

Issue

Section

Articles