EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Appraisal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol48.Iss3.3089Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine EFL teachers’ perceptions of teacher appraisal in terms of its purpose, methods, and criteria. Data for this study were collected from 20 EFL teachers who were given a questionnaire asking them to indicate to what extent they agreed with a total of 44 statements in a Likert-style format, with space to write their comments. Basic statistical analysis of responses revealed several characteristics that many teachers considered to reflect effective teacher appraisal. In terms of purpose, teachers seemed to lean more towards conducting appraisals for professional improvement purposes than making personnel decisions. As for methods, teachers seemed to prefer to be evaluated by their supervisors, whether in terms of classroom observation or evaluation of their written work (tests, portfolios, etc.), to being evaluated by non-EFL supervisors, students, or external evaluators (whether in terms of classroom observation, questionnaires or asking them to take tests). As for evaluation criteria, the results revealed that teachers strongly agreed with most of the evaluation criteria in the literature but were less enthusiastic about such criteria as knowledge of learning theories, use of visual aids, and using higher cognitive levels in discussions and examinations.
Downloads
References
Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D. (1997). Techniques in the clinical supervision of
teachers: Telling tales about school. Educational Leadership, 41(7), 16-18.
Bailey, Kathleen M. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Bartlett, Stephen (1998). Teacher perceptions of the purposes of staff appraisal: a response to
Kyriacou. Teacher Development, 2(3), 479 — 491.
Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work. New York: John Wiley and
Sons, Inc.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to
language pedagogy (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
Casey, R. J., Gentile, P., & Bigger, S. W. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective. Higher Education, 34(4), 459-482
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. New Jersey: ETS
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in organizational context: a review of literature, Review of Educational Research, 53, 285–328.
Daresh, John C. (2001). Supervision as proactive leadership (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Genesee, Fred (2001). Evaluation. In Carter, Ronald and Nunan, David (Eds.), The Cambridge
guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Glickman, C. D., Stephen P. Gordon, & Jovita M. R. (1998). Supervision of instruction: A
developmental approach (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Goodwin, L. D., & Stevens, E. A. (1993). The influence of gender on university faculty
members’ perceptions of “good” teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 166-85.
Haefele, D.L. (1993). Evaluating teachers: A call for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 21-31.
Hutchinson, Barry (1995). Appraising appraisal: Some tensions and some possibilities. Higher Education, 29(1), 19-35.
Kyriacou, Chris (1997). Appraisers’ views of teacher appraisal. Teacher Development, 1(1) 35 — 41.
Lo, C. W. (1998). Teacher appraisal - Perceptions of appraisers (middle managers) and appraisees (teachers) in Hong Kong secondary schools. (Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, The University of Hong Kong, 1998).
McGreal, T. L. (1988). Evaluation for enhancing instruction: Linking teacher evaluation and staff
development. In S. J. Stanley & W. J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six
prescriptions for success (pp. 1–29). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Pennington, M. C., & Young, A. L. (1989). Approaches to faculty evaluation for ESL.
TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 619-646.
Popham, W. J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269-273
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge. Quoted in Casey, R. John, Gentile, Patricia, and Bigger, Stephen W. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective. Higher Education, 34(4), 459-482.
Smith, R. (1995). Staff appraisal in higher education: A study of performance review at Nene College, Northampton. Higher Education, 30(2), 189-205
Stake, R.E. (1989). The evaluation of teaching. In Simons, H., & Elliott, J. (Eds.) Rethinking appraisal and assessment. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
Ur, Penny (2012). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmed Hamid Abdulrazzaq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.