Semiotic Analysis of Zionists-Hezbollah Conflict (2024) in Selected American and Iranian Media

Noor Liwaa Abdulaali; Prof. Dr.Enas Naji Kadhim

doi:10.31185/eduj.Vol58.Iss1.4034

Authors

Noor Liwaa Abdulaali University of Wasit / College of Education for Human Sciences
Prof. Dr.Enas Naji Kadhim University of Wasit / College of Education for Human Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol58.Iss1.4034

Keywords:

Semiotic Analysis, Barthes’ Model(1968), Zionists-Hezbollah Conflict, Media Bias.

Abstract

This study conducts a semiotic analysis of selected photos from American and Iranian media reports on the June 2024 Zionists-Hezbollah conflict to uncover how visual representation and framing differ across these media channels. Using Barthes’ model of semiotics, the analysis focuses on denotation and connotation to reveal both the images' cultural understanding (stadium) and emotional impact (punctum). The study examines four photos: two from CBS News and two from Press TV. Findings indicate that American media frames the conflict as a security issue, emphasizing Hezbollah as a militant threat and portraying the IDF as a defenders. In contrast, Iranian media frames it as a struggle against Israeli aggression, describing Hezbollah as a legitimate resistance and the IDF as aggressors. Both media use visuals to evoke strong emotional responses, but the framing and portrayal of actors reflect their distinct political and cultural contexts. This comparative analysis highlights the influence of cultural and political contexts on media framing and audience perception, contributing to a deeper understanding of media bias and its impact on public discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press.

Bakalash, T., & Riemer, H. (2013). Exploring ad-elicited emotional arousal and memory for the ad using fMRI. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.768065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.768065

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. University of Texas Press.

Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang.

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.

Barthes, R. (1981). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Hill and Wang.

Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220658

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128-138). Hutchinson.

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Columbia University Press.

Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.

Quinn, S. (2017). As photos flood our screens, which ones hold our attention? Poynter. Retrieved.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Saussure, F. de (1983). Course in General Linguistics. Open Court.

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001