PHONOLGICAL SHIFTS IN SOCIAL MEDIA DISCOURSE: THE INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION ON LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol59.Iss2.4297Keywords:
Phonological shifts, digital communication, phonetic spellings, expressive orthographyAbstract
The rise of social media has transformed linguistic practices, shaping phonological patterns in both written and spoken communication. This study examines how platforms—particularly Facebook and TikTok—drive phonetic innovations such as nonstandard spellings (yasss, gonna), regional accent transcription, and stylized prosody through capitalization, punctuation, and repetition. It also explores the role of emojis and symbols in phonological representation. Analyzing approximately 50 samples, the study identifies key phonological patterns contributing to informal language normalization, linguistic hybridization, and global communication. Using phonetic transcription, it documents how phonological shifts manifest in digital writing and compares spoken and written forms to assess phoneme substitution, assimilation, and elision. Unlike prior research that conflates phonological and orthographic shifts, this study distinguishes between them, offering a focused analysis of phonetic processes in social media discourse. Additionally, it situates these shifts within a broader discourse framework, examining how users strategically employ phonetic modifications to shape meaning, express identity, and engage in digital interactions. The findings underscore how social media fosters linguistic creativity, challenges phonological norms, and reflects broader sociocultural and identity dynamics.
Downloads
References
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.003.0002
• Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002
• Jones, R. H., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Talking text and talking back: “My BFF Jill” from Boob Tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1050-1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x
• Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Blackwell Publishers.
• Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65.
• O'Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2011). From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in Teaching and Learning: From Theory and Research to Practice. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46048-6
• Tagliamonte, S., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
• Thurlow, C. (2003). Semiotic Traffic: The Case of the Internet and Its Impact on Social Interaction. Oxford University Press.
• Thurlow, C., & Poff, M. (2013). Text messaging. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 163-200). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.163
• Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 م.م بشرى فرهود خضير
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
