Analysis of Deixis in the Iraqi Constitution of 2005
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol1.Iss45.1534چکیده
The concept of deixis is one of the most important topics in the pragmatic analysis that needs to be clarified; deixis is used to analyse the text, utterance or sentence because every utterance is a reference used to pointing about people, something, place or time. The meaning of this utterance will be clear when the listeners or readers know about who, where and when the utterance is uttered. The current study aims at clarifying Deixis that exist in the Iraqi Constitution of 2005 and how the constitutional makers use these elements in the selected articles. To achieve the aims of the study, several articles have been selected from the Constitution as data to be analysed and a qualitative methodology has been employed in analyzing the collected data based on Levinson (1983). It has been hypothesized that the ordinary readers of the Iraqi Constitution face difficulty in understanding the meaning of a lot of the articles of the constitution because there are false and misuses of the deictic expressions. The study has come up with the results that deictic expressions are widely used in the Iraqi Constitution to convey certain aims. The use of such linguistic and pragmatic elements is proved to have an obvious impact on ordinary peoples’ understanding of the legal document.
دانلودها
مراجع
References
Bogdan, R. & Taylor, J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research method.
Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
Bulmer, E. (2017). What is a Constitution? Principles and concepts.
International IDEA Strömsborg, Sweden.
Cruse, A. (2006). A glossary of semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press.
Fillmore, J.(1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In
Jarvella, R.J. Klein, W. Chichester, Wiley: 31-59.
Finegan, E. ( 2004). Language: Its structure and use. Wadsworth.
Fromkin, V. Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language .
Seventh Edition. United States: Thomson.
Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics. New York: Oxford .
Grundy, P. (2008). Doing pragmatics. Great Britain: Hodder Education .
Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics. England: Pearson
Education Limited.
Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics (Second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, O. (1933). Essentials of English grammar. London .
Levinson, C. (1983). Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Linguistic semantics. An introduction. Cambridge University
Press .
Lyons, J.( 1996). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University
Press.
Maley, Y. (1994). The language of the law, In: John Gibbons (ed.), Language
and the law.
Matthews, H. (1997). Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford
University Press.
Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics : An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
Meyer, F. (2009). Introducing English linguistics: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Rose, R. and Kasper, R. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. In K.R, Rose
& R., Kasper. Pragmatics in language teaching (pp.1–12). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in introduction: An introduction to pragmatics.
New York, NY: Longman.
Triebel, V. ( 2006). Pitfalls of English as a contract language . London
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford .University Press.
Widdowson, G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford University Press
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
حق نشر 2021 Journal of Education College Wasit University
این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 می باشد.
